While the REVO certainly is low deflection, it's also very muted in terms of feedback. Compare a new Revo and a New Cynergy side by side and look at the quality and consistency in the finish.Ģ. Having played extensively with both shafts I would give the nod to the Cuetec for the following reasons – in no particular order ġ. However, it is long overdue in my opinion. I didn't want to deal with tip changes where there is no ferrule. It was hard for me to pick Revo, knowing that, and a lot of guys complain about the Revo tip. I have to admit, I have a buddy whose Revo basically exploded the second time he hit a ball. This narrowed my choice to basically Revo and Cuetec. I wanted to pick a cue that came out of a big shop, as I think there would be fewer lemons where there is a big operation. I picked the cuetec because of the taper and tip (at least in part), and I am very satisfied, but I admit some of this stuff is very subjective.
I do think the feeling the tip gives you changes from when it is new. The tip does feel a little "soft" to me when you first get it, but as I have played with it, I think it has become hard and durable, and I think it is a great tip. I have to say that I disagree with friend here on the Tiger tip. I have hit a ball or two with the revo, and I do not find the taper totally offensive. To me, it does not seem skinny, and I find no taper in the first 15in to be very comfortable. Based on these comments, I thought I would like the Cuetec, and I do.
One of the main reasons I picked the Cuetec is that a number of reviewers I read complained about the revo taper, and complimented the Cuetec taper-or lack of it. Previously, I played with a regular maple shaft. I have been playing with the Cuetec for the last two months.
0 kommentar(er)
